http://www.techinsider.io/nintendo-shuts-down-fan-made-games-2016-9
I think the Mario/Zelda/Pokémon days on ticalc.org are counted D:
Uh oh. There goes Mario CE. :P
Well, Super DMCA Bros or Super Giana Sisters sounds like it's where it's at if your game gets hit too. That and I have unused tiles for platformers that could be handy if that is ever needed. I hope Mario on calcs is safe, though
:'( I really dont get us why Nintendo hates them all so much... :( :(
The creators of such games are their greatest fans and instad of losing money it's much more like they boost my interest to play even more nintendo games... (see all the clones online, start thinking about good old mario and zelda games since they are just like super effective advertising, want to play nintendo's stuff).
So why do they punish them instead of hire them...?
Hackers that beat a system are pretty often hired by the exact same company to improve their security stuff. So why are game developers that copy a game and create the same thing Nintendo needed a huge team for all on their own sued and punished instead of hired? Haven't they proven they 1) love nintendo's games 2) have the necessary knowledge/skills to create high-level games, too? :(
/me starts hating the game industry... Once they wanted to create games. Now they want to get rich :(
Edit: Using the name "Maryo" instead of Mario should be enough - The "Secret Maryo Chronicles" have been out since years and become pretty famous but never got banned iirc ^^
Quote from: p2 on September 13, 2016, 10:10:20 PM
:'( I really dont get us why Nintendo hates them all so much... :( :(
The creators of such games are their greatest fans and instad of losing money it's much more like they boost my interest to play even more nintendo games... (see all the clones online, start thinking about good old mario and zelda games since they are just like super effective advertising, want to play nintendo's stuff).
So why do they punish them instead of hire them...?
Hackers that beat a system are pretty often hired by the exact same company to improve their security stuff. So why are game developers that copy a game and create the same thing Nintendo needed a huge team for all on their own sued and punished instead of hired? Haven't they proven they 1) love nintendo's games 2) have the necessary knowledge/skills to create high-level games, too? :(
/me starts hating the game industry... Once they wanted to create games. Now they want to get rich :(
Edit: Using the name "Maryo" instead of Mario should be enough - The "Secret Maryo Chronicles" have been out since years and become pretty famous but never got banned iirc ^^
The problem is that Nintendo more or less
has to crack down on fangames, due to copyright laws being cty. If they don't show active effort to defend their IPs, it opens the path for companies to make and sell legal knockoffs, because they'll have shown precedence for letting stuff slide. It's all around a bad situation, and not gonna improve anytime soon, but it is how it is.
Quote from: Turiq on September 13, 2016, 10:56:09 PM
Quote from: p2 on September 13, 2016, 10:10:20 PM
:'( I really dont get us why Nintendo hates them all so much... :( :(
The creators of such games are their greatest fans and instad of losing money it's much more like they boost my interest to play even more nintendo games... (see all the clones online, start thinking about good old mario and zelda games since they are just like super effective advertising, want to play nintendo's stuff).
So why do they punish them instead of hire them...?
Hackers that beat a system are pretty often hired by the exact same company to improve their security stuff. So why are game developers that copy a game and create the same thing Nintendo needed a huge team for all on their own sued and punished instead of hired? Haven't they proven they 1) love nintendo's games 2) have the necessary knowledge/skills to create high-level games, too? :(
/me starts hating the game industry... Once they wanted to create games. Now they want to get rich :(
Edit: Using the name "Maryo" instead of Mario should be enough - The "Secret Maryo Chronicles" have been out since years and become pretty famous but never got banned iirc ^^
The problem is that Nintendo more or less has to crack down on fangames, due to copyright laws being s***ty. If they don't show active effort to defend their IPs, it opens the path for companies to make and sell legal knockoffs, because they'll have shown precedence for letting stuff slide. It's all around a bad situation, and not gonna improve anytime soon, but it is how it is.
They don't
have to but the decide to
do so. It's really just them trying to be cs. There is no money to loose, just power to demostrate.
Quote from: DarkestEx on September 13, 2016, 11:00:41 PM
Quote from: Turiq on September 13, 2016, 10:56:09 PM
Quote from: p2 on September 13, 2016, 10:10:20 PM
:'( I really dont get us why Nintendo hates them all so much... :( :(
The creators of such games are their greatest fans and instad of losing money it's much more like they boost my interest to play even more nintendo games... (see all the clones online, start thinking about good old mario and zelda games since they are just like super effective advertising, want to play nintendo's stuff).
So why do they punish them instead of hire them...?
Hackers that beat a system are pretty often hired by the exact same company to improve their security stuff. So why are game developers that copy a game and create the same thing Nintendo needed a huge team for all on their own sued and punished instead of hired? Haven't they proven they 1) love nintendo's games 2) have the necessary knowledge/skills to create high-level games, too? :(
/me starts hating the game industry... Once they wanted to create games. Now they want to get rich :(
Edit: Using the name "Maryo" instead of Mario should be enough - The "Secret Maryo Chronicles" have been out since years and become pretty famous but never got banned iirc ^^
The problem is that Nintendo more or less has to crack down on fangames, due to copyright laws being s***ty. If they don't show active effort to defend their IPs, it opens the path for companies to make and sell legal knockoffs, because they'll have shown precedence for letting stuff slide. It's all around a bad situation, and not gonna improve anytime soon, but it is how it is.
They don't have to but the decide to do so. It's really just them trying to be d***s. There is no money to loose, just power to demostrate.
They don't *have* to, yes. But if they leave the stuff up, it becomes increasingly hard to argue against actual ripoffs in court. It's not a trade-off Nintendo is willing to make, apparently, and I don't entirely blame them for it.
For what it's worth, fangames, especially ones that keep trademarked franchise names and the like intact, are copyright infringement. While the intention of fangame devs may be very much pure, it's still illegal.
THey didn't crack down as hard on fan games a few years ago, though. They only did so with a few special cases. It looks like they're scared that fan games lose them money and due to the poor Wii U sales they're not desperate to make people buy their games instead of downloading fan games. I bet they just changed some administration staff and the new ones are on a power trip. It seems like it got worse after Iwata died.
Also Turiq the issue is that those fan games are not sold for money. I could understand if Nintendo shut down fan games sold for money, but now we're talking about small fan games.
Quote from: DJ Omnimaga on September 13, 2016, 11:11:05 PM
THey didn't crack down as hard on fan games a few years ago, though. They only did so with a few special cases. It looks like they're scared that fan games lose them money and due to the poor Wii U sales they're not desperate to make people buy their games instead of downloading fan games. I bet they just changed some administration staff and the new ones are on a power trip. It seems like it got worse after Iwata died.
Also Turiq the issue is that those fan games are not sold for money. I could understand if Nintendo shut down fan games sold for money, but now we're talking about small fan games.
Well the line is simple to draw. Let everything non-commerical alone and forbid commercial clones. That's the way to go.
They should stop blaming others for their c console. They messed up there. The Wii U has equal and partially worse hardware than the XBox 360 which came out a year before the original Wii. The 360 is now new cheaper than the Wii U and still better. Apart from games, Nintendo really sucks at hardware recently.
As far as crackdowns becoming more popular goes, it might well be because we saw the release of two high-profile games recently, AM2R and Pokemon Uranium. I could easily imagine that other fangames didn't get backlash from nintendo because they didn't get as much attention, and they're just retroactively cracking down now. Granted, Iwata being a leading figure for a long time probably had some effect as well, but despite his own views, legal departments often just do their own thing.
Regardless of the games being not sold for money, it's not exactly kosher. Honestly, it's kinda surprising that they stayed up as long as they did.
And you guys complained about nazi walrii, even though the true nazis were among us all along...
I can't say i'm surprised, and Nintendo are not the only copyright nazis out there.
There's also Blizzard, who took down Overwatch c and a previously unreleased game, Warcraft Adventure : Lord of the Clans.
They are not going to embrace Unseen64 folks, that's for sure.
I encourage every member here who works on a game to release its source code, put it under a free software license,
avoid proprietary "IPs" at all cost and not even make a mention of them.
It is clear they do not wish to have fans embracing their work and only cares about money.
When raping a child or giving a nuke to a terrorist gets you less jail time than copyright infrigement (see aaron swartz),
you know something is wrong with your gov.
So lets put down our controllers and spend more time raping people,
instead of being actually creative and spending 7 years on a game that will get you in jail.
Something we can do is try to create a new character/set of enemies/graphics and universe similar to Mario but different, and try to generate lots of hype about it. It would have to be named in reference to Nintendo actions, though, like No Mario's Sky author did by renaming his game to No DMCA Sky. Super DMCA Brothers has a nice ring to it IMHO. Same of Legend/Tales of Deyhem-Cehay (with the D, M, C and A letters drawn bigger in the logo or in caps) or Legend of DMCA.
Anyway I am tempted to rename some of my calc games at some point to reflect that. The Legend of Zelda: Dark Link Quest would become either The Dark Curse like I almost did in 2005, or maybe Legend of Deyhem-Cehay, while Super Mario Smash Dance would become Super :walrii: Smash Dance.
Oh and while at it, we have :walrii: right? Why not use it? :P (although the fact he's 24 pixels large might be a problem)
It's fun to get a DMCA
It's fun to get a DMCA
You can get yourself sued, you can have a good lawsuit,
They can do whatever they feel...
DMCA
/me runs
Yeah, the copyright laws in the US sucks and they should check that out. (Of course they'll never do that because capitalism.)
I doubt the laws will be changed. If they try then big companies will most likely try to block the move and I bet bribery will be involved, even if those companies have no plan to go full Nintendo mode. But the Internet is powerful if people wants to, and a big company's image can be totally ruined overnight if fanboys don't overshadow protesters. Heck, even the TI signing keys in 2009, despite the TI community being pretty much irrelevant at the time, still managed to make Wall Street Journal headlines after TI sent DMCA notices to those who published the private key.
Quote from: p2 on September 13, 2016, 10:10:20 PM
Edit: Using the name "Maryo" instead of Mario should be enough - The "Secret Maryo Chronicles" have been out since years and become pretty famous but never got banned iirc ^^
No go the whole hog.
Matio CE...
Mateo CE...
I think Mateo CE
For Mateo's Mario clone, basically there are some minor changes, physic and cosmetic-wise, and the game supports alternate graphic appvars. Basically, if a DMCA is sent then all that should be needed is replacing the graphics and name. If Nintendont requests the takedown of the entire code then that part of the DMCA can probably be fought, since the code contains no copyrighted content (it would be like Apple suing Microsoft for using gray in Windows 10 UI)
actually that'd be a pretty funny lawsuit... :thumbsup:
anyways DJ is right. there's no such thinkg as a copyright on "jump and run games" or anything like that.
nor are any of the mechanisms like pipes or plants on top of pipes copyrighted.
so just changing the name and the graphics should be enough already :)
If i make a game where the protagonist can have sex with Natural Harmonia Gropius,
do you think cendo will sue me ?
Because if they do, that would bring more attention to a cographic game and cendo will not be able
to handle the fact they publicly acknowledge such stuff exists online, right ?
Perhaps it is the only way to avoid being sued by cendo.
Codewalrus must comply with cendo's demands and remove all of their trademarks.
I think we could replace all mentions to the infamous monsters to Porkyman.
Replace ***tendo with cendo and so on.
What do you think,
@DJ Omnimaga @streetwalrus
@aeTIos ?
I know they shut down rule 34 princess Peach fan art before, because it tarnished their brand. Nowadays they would sue parents who name their newborn kids Mario for copyright infrigment if they wanted to.
that must be an awesome dad... calling your children Mario and Luigi :D
also
@gameblabla I think you'll get in trouble anyways...
Also idk what they tried to shut down... but all the strange princess peach pr0n is still there... :ninja:
Quote from: kotu on October 21, 2016, 03:39:04 AM
Quote from: p2 on September 13, 2016, 10:10:20 PM
Edit: Using the name "Maryo" instead of Mario should be enough - The "Secret Maryo Chronicles" have been out since years and become pretty famous but never got banned iirc ^^
No go the whole hog.
Matio CE...
Mateo CE...
I think Mateo CE
or even just name it backwards oirum people will understand right they already did it (http://[b]http://www.dotsarecool.com/twitch/images/wms/wms00.png%5B/b%5D)
actually it took me a minute or so to get behind that stupid name...
once I realized it was just backwards I felt even more stupid than the name.... :P
Cuz actually the name isnt stupid... its just me :(
You just confused me your saying
the name is stupid but it isn't and you are stupid from not knowing but your not stupid.
that's at least what i'm getting from this.
In summary, it took him a while before figuring out that Oriam was Mario backwards. By the way, that's exactly what Mateo did with Super Mario CE: Reverse the name.
That's what I was referring to (that game's name)
@ztortat: it took me minutes to find out it wasnt just some stupid name but actually something genius (mario backwards). And then I felt stupid because it took me so long
By the way, the first versions of Metroid II: Evolution for the TI-84+ were called Diortem :P
oh that makes sence
Quote from: p2 on December 21, 2016, 01:27:45 PM
That's what I was referring to (that game's name)
@ztortat: it took me minutes to find out it wasnt just some stupid name but actually something genius (mario backwards). And then I felt stupid because it took me so long