You can help CodeWalrus stay online by donating here. | New CodeWalrus | Old (dark mode) | Old (light) | Discord server

BF Interpreter because idk

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

1
0
b/Calculator Development publicado por u/JWinslow23 March 24, 2016, 08:02:16 PM
I guess I'll leave this here with no explanation.
11 Replies 11 Views
Inicia sesión o crea una cuenta para dejar un comentario
Sign up Log in
u/Dream of Omnimaga March 24, 2016, 08:31:41 PM
Is that in Axe? I think I recall @Juju making a BF interpreter in 2010, but it was in BASIC.
0
u/Dudeman313 March 24, 2016, 09:13:11 PM
Quote from: JWinslow23 on March 24, 2016, 08:02:16 PM
I guess I'll leave this here with no explanation.
I want an explanation!  :P
The title is somewhat self-explanatory, though.
0
u/Ivoah March 24, 2016, 09:31:21 PM
Someone also made a BF compiler for the CSE
0
u/Dream of Omnimaga March 24, 2016, 10:03:50 PM
Quote from: Dudeman313 on March 24, 2016, 09:13:11 PM
Quote from: JWinslow23 on March 24, 2016, 08:02:16 PM
I guess I'll leave this here with no explanation.
I want an explanation!  :P
The title is somewhat self-explanatory, though.
Brainf*ck is an interpreted programming language that isn't really meant to be programmed in, but rather was intended to make something much harder to decipher than assembly just for the sake of it.
0
u/Snektron March 24, 2016, 10:12:08 PM
I made a BF interpreter for Ti 84 + in assembly a while ago too. Always a fun little project
0
u/JWinslow23 March 24, 2016, 10:12:41 PM
Quote from: DJ Omnimaga on March 24, 2016, 10:03:50 PM
Quote from: Dudeman313 on March 24, 2016, 09:13:11 PM
Quote from: JWinslow23 on March 24, 2016, 08:02:16 PM
I guess I'll leave this here with no explanation.
I want an explanation!  :P
The title is somewhat self-explanatory, though.
Brainf*ck is an interpreted programming language that isn't really meant to be programmed in, but rather was intended to make something much harder to decipher than assembly just for the sake of it.
Actually, it was meant to be a Turing-complete language with the smallest compiler possible. The original designer got it down to 200 bytes iirc.

And no, it is not in Axe. Why would it even be in Axe?
0
u/Dream of Omnimaga March 24, 2016, 11:49:09 PM
Quote from: JWinslow23 on March 24, 2016, 10:12:41 PM
Why would it even be in Axe?
Because Axe is your main language? I think my question was a valid question.
0
u/JWinslow23 March 24, 2016, 11:51:27 PM
Quote from: DJ Omnimaga on March 24, 2016, 11:49:09 PM
Quote from: JWinslow23 on March 24, 2016, 10:12:41 PM
Why would it even be in Axe?
Because Axe is your main language? I think my question was a valid question.
How would you even take input for that? :P
0
u/Dream of Omnimaga March 24, 2016, 11:51:48 PM
Didn't Axe have an input command?
0
u/JoeYoung March 24, 2016, 11:52:48 PM
Isn't the whole point of the brainc compiler that it's only 200-300 bytes?
0
u/JWinslow23 March 25, 2016, 03:14:46 AM
Yes, JoeYoung. It is.
0
1
Start a Discussion

b/Calculator Development

Showcase your newest TI, Casio, HP, Numworks or Sharp calculator projects here, discuss programming and share or browse user tutorials!

320
Topics
Explore Board
Website statistics


MyCalcs | Ticalc.org | Cemetech | Omnimaga | TI-Basic Developer | MaxCoderz | TI-Story | Casiocalc.org | Casiopeia | The Museum of HP Calculators | HPCalc.org | CnCalc.org | Music 2000 Community | TI Education | Casio Education | HP Calcs | NumWorks | SwissMicros | Sharp Calculators
Powered by EzPortal